Photo by Anika De Klerk on Unsplash

The British Royal Family’s public statements over the past two centuries provide fascinating examples of how formal English can be adapted for modern use. From Queen Victoria’s proclamations to recent royal speeches, these expressions offer valuable lessons in both formal and conversational English.

Queen Victoria’s famous statement “We are not amused” demonstrates the royal ‘we’ and British understatement. While we wouldn’t use the royal ‘we’ today, the structure of expressing disapproval through understatement remains quintessentially British. In modern professional settings, one might say “I am not amused by these quarterly figures” or “The board was not amused by the presentation.” This phrasing carries more weight than simply saying “I don’t like this.”

Her declaration “The important thing is not what they think of me, but what I think of them” teaches confident self-expression. Modern professionals might adapt this when facing criticism: “The important thing isn’t what the competition thinks of our approach, but what we think of theirs.” It’s particularly useful in job interviews when discussing previous roles or challenging situations.

The King’s famous statement about public speaking difficulties, “I have had to work hard at it,” demonstrates British modesty about overcoming challenges. This phrase structure works perfectly in modern professional contexts: “I wasn’t naturally good at public speaking – I have had to work hard at it” or “Coding didn’t come easily to me – I have had to work hard at it.” It shows determination while acknowledging difficulties.

The late Queen’s expertise in diplomatic language offers numerous lessons for professional communication. Her statement “Grief is the price we pay for love” demonstrates how to discuss difficult topics with dignity. This structure can be adapted for professional setbacks: “Challenge is the price we pay for growth” or “Investment is the price we pay for development.”

Her famous phrase “Let us not take ourselves too seriously” teaches the British art of combining authority with humility. In modern workplace settings, a team leader might say “Let us not overthink this problem” or “Let us not lose sight of our main objective.” The structure “Let us not” offers a gentle way to guide behaviour without giving direct orders.

Prince William’s statement “There is no time for fear when you’re being shot at” demonstrates British understatement in extreme situations. While most won’t face such dramatic circumstances, the structure works well for business challenges: “There is no time for doubt when deadlines approach” or “There is no time for hesitation when opportunities arise.”

The royal habit of using “one” instead of “I” or “you” can be adapted for professional settings. When Queen Elizabeth said “One must try to do one’s best,” she demonstrated how to give advice without seeming preachy. Modern usage might include: “One should always verify sources” in academic settings, or “One finds that preparation is essential” in business contexts.

When faced with family challenges, the Queen’s response “Some recollections may vary” demonstrated masterful diplomatic language. This phrase structure proves valuable in professional disagreements: “Some interpretations of the data may vary” or “Some understandings of the brief may vary.” It acknowledges disagreement without creating conflict.

The royal technique of acknowledging issues while maintaining dignity provides excellent templates for professional communication. The Queen’s “1992 is not a year on which I shall look back with undiluted pleasure” demonstrates how to address difficulties with understatement. Modern usage might include: “The last quarter is not one I’ll review with undiluted pleasure” or “The project launch was not an event I’ll recall with undiluted pleasure.”

Living with a British host family helps students understand when to employ more formal language and when to be casual. Host families can explain how royal phrases have influenced everyday speech and when their use might be appropriate or humorous.

The royal preference for “indeed” instead of “yes” demonstrates formal agreement. In modern professional settings, “indeed” carries weight: “Indeed, the proposal has merit” sounds more considered than a simple “yes.”

Japanese students often seek to master “Queen’s English” (女王の英語 – Joō no Eigo), considering it the most prestigious form of British English. However, it’s important to understand that modern British English exists on a spectrum. What many call “Queen’s English” is more accurately described as Received Pronunciation (RP) or BBC English, characterised by clear pronunciation and traditional grammar patterns.

The late Queen Elizabeth II’s speech patterns demonstrate key features that Japanese learners find valuable:

• Clear pronunciation of word endings, particularly important given Japanese phonology
• Precise vowel sounds that contrast with American pronunciation
• Careful articulation of consonant clusters, which can be challenging for Japanese speakers
• Traditional grammar structures that align well with Japanese formal language concepts (keigo)

For Japanese students living with British host families, understanding the relationship between formal “Queen’s English” and everyday British speech is crucial. Much like the difference between 敬語 (keigo) and casual Japanese, British English adjusts formality based on context. The royal family’s public speaking demonstrates this flexibility – they maintain clear pronunciation whilst adapting their language to different audiences.

Understanding royal language patterns helps with:

• “One hopes” instead of “I hope” – useful in formal writing
• “Do let us” instead of “let’s” – more formal but still friendly
• “Most pleased” instead of “very happy” – professionally appropriate joy

Want to master formal British English while understanding its modern applications? London Homestays provides accommodation with local families who can help you navigate between formal and casual English usage.